Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
Most SSR and RFLP markers were relatively evenly distributed among different LGs in contrast to the moderately clustered AFLP markers.
Majority of the cells were strongly positive for CD9 and CD44, whereas hematopoietic stem cell markers were relatively undetectable.
In contrast to AFLP markers, the SSR markers were relatively evenly distributed, although slight clustering was observed in some specific regions.
Samples in the luminal epithelial/ER+ group came from patients who were estrogen receptor (ER) positive and whose breast luminal cell markers were relatively overexpressed [ 1].
Most SSR and RFLP markers were relatively evenly distributed among the different LGs, although the AFLP markers were moderately clustered and several relatively large gaps still remained (Fig. 3).
Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) values for these markers were relatively low, with only 35.5% of DArTs having PIC values of 0.4-0.5 0.4-0.56% with PIC vandes < 0.2 (Table 2).
Similar(52)
Design and analysis of MIP markers are relatively simple.
A 2010 report from the National Research Council concluded that such systems are "inherently fallible" because they identify people within certain degrees of certainty and because biological markers are relatively easy to copy.
These markers are relatively uniformly distributed in the genome.
The 12 markers are relatively close to each other, showing a mean interval of 2.92 cM.
The pairwise LD between these four markers was relatively high (D' = 0.99, 0.83, and 0.93, respectively).
Related(19)
markers were fairly
markers were quite
parameters were relatively
manifestations were relatively
traces were relatively
markers were reasonably
markers were found
markers was relatively
markers detected relatively
markers remained relatively
markers appeared relatively
markers yielded relatively
markers had relatively
markers showed relatively
markers were sufficiently
markers were related
markers were referring
markers were noted
markers were maintained
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com