Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
Although the intensity of the markers was somewhat variable between samples, 49 out of 52 markers were monomorphic (i.e., present in all samples), while the remaining three markers were found in five of the six samples.
Three markers were monomorphic for S. behrianus while eight markers were monomorphic for S. quadridentatus (Table 3).
MdDFR remained unlinked (LOD score < 3) and the remaining markers were monomorphic in this population.
By contrast, all markers were monomorphic in GRZ, except for two markers in males.
Ten markers were monomorphic, and 58 markers could not be resolved and unambiguously scored.
The PSY1 markers were monomorphic across all of the inbred lines.
Similar(41)
This occurred primarily through markers being monomorphic (uninformative) in certain samples, and to a small extent through missing data for certain markers in specific individuals.
On further analysis, we noted that in the MS-2000 populallon, all markers in moderate LD with BARC1.01Gm20_31972955 had very low minor allele frequencies; within the IL-1966 population, many of these markers are monomorphic.
Zero values indicate populations where the SNP marker was monomorphic.
However, this marker was monomorphic among the parents of the DH population.
Thirteen out of 16 markers were polymorphic, one marker was monomorphic, and two markers amplified unreliably (Table 1).
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com