Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
Results obtained with dominant markers were as reliable as results from codominant SSLP markers [ 1].
However, none of these three markers were as strongly prognostic as DLEC1 and MLH1 methylation in this cohort.
Breeding values based on realized genomic relationships obtained from SNP markers were as accurate as predictions based on the traditional pedigree-based genetic evaluation, based on comparison of SE estimates.
The levels of tumor markers were as follows: CEA, 10.3 ng/mL and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, 785.24 U/mL.
The levels of tumor markers were as follows: carcinoembryonic antigen, 2.8��ng/mL; cytokeratin 19 fragment, 1.4 ng/mL; neuron-specific enolase, 21.0 ng/mL; and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide, 84.4 pg/mL.
The serum levels of tumor markers were as follows: carcinoembryonic antigen, 1.9 ng/mL; AFP, 3.6 ng/mL; lens culinaris agglutinin A-reactive α-fetoprotein, 33 %; and DCP, 20 mAU/mL.
Similar(45)
Our data suggest that a marker panel consisting of BAT26, NR21 and NR27 markers was as accurate as the five- marker panel for MSI analysis.
Genotyping of these markers was as performed as described by Grahn et al. (2004).
The problem in using age as a marker is as follows.
DNA extraction and genotype assays of PCR-based markers was as described (Hsu et al. 2014).
Markers are as in (B – E ).
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com