Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(20)
Using established cell-type specific markers we compared retinal morphology and composition in Sez-6 wild-type and knockout mice.
In the absence of specific and unique cell surface markers, we compared two major types of bone marrow derived cells based primarily on their in vitro adhesion and growth characteristics.
With 8 cloned markers we compared the physical map of chromosome III with the genetic map described before (Fig. 1, Debets et al. 1993).
Using dataset C (1200 individuals in 30 half-sib groups and 10 000 markers), we compared hsphase with other software programs.
To test independence of markers, we compared the observed number of shared genes, in inverted regions, to those that would be expected under pure chance.
To establish the prognostic value of these biological markers, we compared the cytokine expression by lymphocytes in septic patients that survived with those that died (D).
Similar(40)
Given that marker order is generally conserved in the shared markers, we compare the distances between the most proximal and distal of the shared markers between the male and female linkage groups to compare rates of recombination.
To circumvent this problem, and to evaluate the efficacy of the virus as a neuronal marker, we compared the labeling pattern it produced in motoneurons (MNs) with the labeling produced by the retrograde label Fluorogold (FG; Fluorochrome, Denver, CO) and immunostaining against choline acetyltransferase (ChAT).
To assess the effectiveness and accuracy of each kind of marker we compared maps built with each marker type separately and with both types of marker combined.
31 Using an ApoE in situ probe as a microglial marker, we compared the number of microglial cells in wt and pink1 −/− zebrafish larvae.
In order to identify a robust SP marker, we compared from different conditions RNA-seq datasets and identified five consistent SP-marker genes (PAQR6, NPSR1, C1orf110, chromogranin A [CHGA], and SOX14).
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com