markers of quality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "markers of quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to indicators or signs that demonstrate the level of quality of a product, service, or process. Example: "The company has established several markers of quality to ensure that their products meet industry standards."

✓ Grammatically correct

Furniture

Evidence evaluation

Food labeling

Management expectations

Branding

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

And look for little markers of quality: dovetail joints on wooden furniture; smooth surfaces; drawers that open cleanly.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Instead, it is recognising which evidence should be considered and which should be ignored, based on objective markers of quality.

The Guardian

Note that the vast majority of food date labels are markers of quality — manufacturers' suggestions of peak freshness and taste, rather than indicators of food safety or health concerns.

The New York Times - Health

Learn what markers of quality your boss wants/needs and deliver on them.

Forbes

The takeaway for brands: Despite all the noise around Amazon's private label brands, consumers are still looking for the markers of quality that established brands signal.

Forbes

Follow Corey Asad on Twitter.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

Elsewhere at the festival, though, ovations can be as cheap and unreliable a marker of quality as the jeers.

The New York Times

Wine experts often use bubble size as a marker of quality, with larger bubbles found in cheap sparkling wines such as prosecco and cava.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Short postoperative ventilation times are accepted as a marker of quality.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

"I don't think we've ever had an administration that thought about the vibrancy of our cultural life as a central public policy," he added, "as a marker of quality of life in a democracy".

The New York Times - Arts

Despite the high costs, day-care workers are paid poverty wages, turnover is high, and only a small percentage of centers are nationally accredited, a marker of quality.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing objective assessments, specify the "markers of quality" being used. This adds clarity and strengthens the credibility of your evaluation.

Common error

Avoid using "markers of quality" without providing context or examples. This can lead to ambiguity and weaken the impact of your statement. Always specify the particular markers you are referencing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "markers of quality" functions primarily as a noun phrase that identifies specific indicators or characteristics that signify a certain level of excellence or standard. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a correct and usable phrase in English. Examples from the provided search snippets demonstrate its role in various contexts, such as assessing furniture quality, evaluating evidence, and determining healthcare standards.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "markers of quality" is a grammatically sound and usable term used to identify specific indicators of excellence or standards. As stated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and applicable in various writing contexts. While it appears most frequently in scientific, news and media, and formal business domains, its analytical nature lends itself to professional and academic settings. To enhance clarity and precision, specify the particular "markers of quality" being referenced, avoiding overgeneralization and contributing to a more robust and credible assessment.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Quality indicators

Replaces "markers" with "indicators", focusing on the function of signifying quality rather than simply marking it.

Quality benchmarks

Substitutes "markers" with "benchmarks", implying a standard against which quality is measured.

Hallmarks of quality

Replaces "markers" with "hallmarks", emphasizing distinctive features that are characteristic of quality.

Quality attributes

Focuses on the inherent characteristics that define quality rather than external signs.

Signals of quality

Uses "signals" to convey that these markers are indications or signs that point to quality.

Quality standards

Emphasizes that these are the accepted level of quality.

Features denoting quality

Shifts the focus to specific features that are indicative of quality.

Indicators of excellence

Elevates the standard from mere quality to a higher level of excellence.

Characteristics of high caliber

Uses "high caliber" to specify a high level of quality, shifting the emphasis to the degree of quality.

Quality determinants

Highlights the aspects that determine the quality.

FAQs

What are some examples of "markers of quality" in academic research?

In academic research, "markers of quality" can include factors such as peer-reviewed publication, a large sample size, appropriate control groups, and rigorous statistical analysis.

How do "indicators of quality" differ from "markers of quality"?

While both phrases are similar, "indicators of quality" often refers to more formalized or standardized measures, whereas "markers of quality" can encompass more subjective or observational signs.

What's a practical way to define "markers of quality" in project management?

In project management, define "markers of quality" by setting clear, measurable goals and performance metrics that align with project objectives and stakeholder expectations.

How can I identify reliable "signs of quality" in online information?

When evaluating online information, look for "signs of quality" such as reputable sources, author credentials, evidence-based content, and absence of bias.