Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(39)
When we compared our findings for p503S, p504S and p510S with our earlier study investigating prostatic specific antigen (PSA) [ 3], as potential markers for prostate tumors, all these three genes were more frequently expressed than PSA in PB from patients with treated CaP (63%, 63% and 100% vs 18%) and untreated CaP (18%, 81 % and 100 vs 9%) and in PB from BPH (25%, 55% and 75% vs 0).
Novel markers for prostate cancer (PCa) detection are needed.
With rapid advances in analytical methods, the number of newly identified bio- markers for prostate cancer is growing steadily.
To find markers for prostate cancer, scientists compared the genetic makeup of 25,000 prostate cancer patients with a similar number of healthy men.
Halin S, Hammarsten P, Adamo H, et al. Tumor indicating normal tissue could be a new source of diagnostic and prognostic markers for prostate cancer.
The inadequacies of prostate specific antigen testing have created a need for novel markers for prostate cancer screening.
Similar(21)
It is expressed by malignant prostatic epithelium and may serve as a potential serum marker for prostate cancer [ 42].
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a well-known tumor marker for prostate cancer (PCa), has been found complexed with IgM in both benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and cancer [ 3].
Annexin A3 (ANXA3) is a potential marker for prostate cancer (PCa).
Improving the P.S.A.? Experts generally agree that the P.S.A. is not an ideal marker for prostate cancer.
Mr. Obama's physicians noted his levels of prostate specific antigen, or PSA, a marker for prostate cancer.
More suggestions(15)
markers for inflammation
markers for topic
markers for bone
markers for selection
markers for scale
markers for dress
markers for micrometastasis
markers for walnut
markers for disease
markers for hepatitis
markers for diagnosis
markers for population
markers for pathogen
markers for pluripotency
markers for strain
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com