Suggestions(2)
Exact(2)
More critically, none of the plastid markers achieved a rate of correct plant identification greater than 70%, either alone or combined.
No other markers achieved a higher rate of tumors solely positive for one marker.
Similar(58)
None of the hERG-only block simulated markers achieved such a level of predictive power, and the majority of the most predictive markers are the result of protocols encapsulating prolongation of APD.
For gastric cancer, combining even 2 or 3 tumor markers achieved better diagnostic accuracy compared to a single marker alone [ 38, 40].
If the situation arises where a number of markers within a single gene achieve modest levels of significance then most people would agree that this finding would be of more interest than if the same number of markers achieved the same results but were randomly positioned with respect to each other.
Four markers achieved genome-wide significance in the unadjusted GWAS, of which three were on chromosome 6 (rs926849; rs2187689; rs7767277) and an intergenic marker on chromosome 3 (rs17034687).
Despite the higher density of markers in the 1KG, only ~63%% of the markers achieved good quality as compared to 97%% of the HapMap imputed markers.
Membership probabilities, interpreted as proximities of individuals to different clusters [ 48], showed that genome-wide SNP markers achieved unambiguous separation of all groups.
When analysis was restricted to the 53 pTa tumours, none of the individual markers achieved statistical significance for the prediction of subsequent tumour progression.
The high density of markers achieved in this ultradense map allowed syntenic studies between lettuce and Vitis vinifera as well as other plant species.
The strongest evidence for linkage was found on chromosome 17 where one marker (D17S2193) achieved a Zmax value of 3.51 and three other markers had Zmax values greater than one including one marker (D17S2195) with a Zmax value greater than 1.5 (Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com