Suggestions(2)
Exact(3)
For the various cell type specific markers four different culture wells per marker were examined for each of the three different groups, leading to the examination of 48 cell culture wells.
To validate the genes obtained via cross-comparison analysis, expression patterns of two genes, namely pum1 (germ cell marker) and rad51 (meiosis marker), were examined via in situ hybridization in medaka testicular sections.
Populations of cells expressing each cell surface marker were examined by analysis of at least 50,000 cells within this gate.
Similar(57)
TDT-based methods possess an intrinsic property of protecting against population stratification, even when only one marker is examined.
The best-fitting position of each marker was examined based on the goodness-of-fit test (chi-square).
In multivariate analysis, each marker was examined separately because of the close correlation between them (correlation coefficients between 0.5 and 0.7, P < 0.001).
The immunohistochemical expression of each marker was examined by light microscopy through calculating 1000 cells per 5 sights and evaluating the average number.
Expression of CD44, a stem cell marker, was examined in two of the lines, YES-1 and YES-2, and in their curcumin-surviving lines.
Any further sampling analysis after this point would lead to an insignificant gain in the estimate of the mean area fraction for the particular tissue marker being examined.
UCMSC cell surface markers were examined using flow cytometry.
Immunolocalization of key osteogenic and vasculogenic lineage specific markers were examined using confocal scanning laser microscopy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com