Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(20)
Then, the GWAS was repeated using the same model on 100 subsamples, enabling the computation of a posterior probability (the number of times the marker was considered significant in the 100 subsamples).
When resistance QTLs against a same pathogen species had overlapping confidence intervals on the integrated map, only one peak marker was considered.
A marker was considered positive when more than 20% of the blasts showed a positive signal.
A bridge marker was considered as such when its name and position were the same in the different mapping populations.
To avoid that the coding of the markers affected the imputation accuracy, every marker was considered twice.
One marker was considered for each QTL region, and no QTL interaction was estimated for QTLs on the same LG.
Similar(40)
As isotype controls were not used, those cells that did not express a certain marker were considered as negative control for positive cells [55].
Currently, no marker is considered to meet these criteria.
Only the units (and not the sizes) from each marker were considered for the analysis.
For the genetic variables, both dominant and recessive models for each genetic marker were considered.
SNPs up to +/-200kb on either side of the marker were considered.
More suggestions(15)
trace was considered
symbol was considered
score was considered
marker was taken into consideration
marker was excluded
marker was identified
marker was lost
marker were considered
marker was elevated
marker was used
marker was genotyped
marker was characterized
marker was placed
marker was detected
marker was named
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com