Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(4)
SNPs showing ≤10% recombination fraction with at least one marker on the reference map were integrated into the map.
If a GBS marker was associated with more than one cosegregating marker on the reference map, it was mapped using the marker with which it shared the smallest number of recombination events.
e-Landing of each SSR marker on the reference rice genome could confirm relative orders of the co-segregating SSR markers on a 1.04 Mbp virtual contig composed of overlapping 10 BAC/PAC clones (Figure 3B).
To compare the order of the common markers, a dot-plot diagram was generated using the physical position of each common marker on the reference genome against its genetic position on the LGs; at the same time, all LGs of the two parental maps were aligned with the reference genome (Additional file 4: Figure S2).
Similar(56)
The 1.04 Mbp virtual contig, composed of overlapping 10 BAC/PAC clones, was delimited by e-Landings of six significant SSR markers on the reference rice genome, 'Os-Nipponbare-Reference-IRGSP-1.0'.
To compare the genetic and physical maps, we investigated the locations of all 1,814 SNP markers on the reference genome.
These SNPs can still show the expected 1 1 allelic ratio in the mapping population, but will be randomly associated with markers on the reference genetic map.
This result suggests that 60% of identified variants are not linked with markers on the reference map used in the bin-mapping approach.
Cosegregation of allelic variants with the markers on the reference map can effectively be used for the removal of erroneously called variants and mapping markers with the high fraction of missing data.
By using the DNA sequences bearing the marker variation sites to Blast search of the genome sequencing data, the genotypes of these 3,277 markers on the reference cultivars Tanjil and on the nine re-sequenced cultivars were obtained and recorded (Additional file 1).
Of 48 markers tested on the reference Houghton (H) strain, one marker failed to amplify for unknown reasons.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com