Exact(4)
In this study, we examined whether UHRF1 can be a novel molecular marker of bladder cancer.
Thus, UHRF1 is much superior to p53 as a potential diagnostic marker of bladder cancer.
Overall, our data further strengthens the association of DEK with bladder cancer and as a potential marker of bladder cancer.
The decreased plasma levels of IL-27 compared to controls observed in our present study reinforces this predictive role as a marker of bladder cancer.
Similar(56)
The paucity of urine markers of bladder cancer with high specificity and sensitivity warrants identification of non-invasive screening methods for early detection and prognosis of bladder cancer.
Recently, SELDI has been successfully used to distinguish pancreatic, ovarian and prostate cancer patients from controls [ 9, 12, 13], and detect markers of bladder cancer in urine [ 14].
We found that there were 28 significant proteins that could be classified as a core network marker and 26, 4, 24, and 13 significant proteins that were specific network markers of bladder, colorectal, liver, and lung cancer, respectively.
Although to date, several markers of bladder cancer have been reported, such as nuclear matrix protein 22, hyaluronic acid, hyaluronidase and nuclear matrix proteins, these markers are ineffective in reducing the number of surveillance cystoscopies due to limited sensitivity and specificity [ 6].
Similar associations have been reported between urinary levels of iAs metabolites and the concentration of transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), a potential marker of urinary bladder cancer, in exfoliated bladder epithelial cells (BECs) isolated from urine of individuals chronically exposed to iAs in drinking water (Valenzuela et al. 2007).
Indeed the methylation of these proteins has been suggested as a marker of invasive bladder carcinoma.
Standard urine cytology (Papanicolaou staining test) for the assessment of markers indicative of bladder cancer was performed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com