Sentence examples for marker intervals considered from inspiring English sources

The observed distribution of loci deviated significantly from the Poisson distribution for all marker intervals considered (15, 20, 25, and 50 cM) and, therefore, was not random (P < 0.001).

To limit the number of genes considered, for each QTL the interval considered was defined by the two SNP markers flanking the QTL peak.

In only three cases where a putative two-QTL model provided a better fit to the data than a single QTL model (UP on OAR9, SSC on OAR17, and PP on OAR26) were the intervals between QTL greater than the marker intervals, these chromosomes can therefore be considered as carrying two different linkage regions for the same trait (Table 4).

Regardless of the interval size used for status prediction, the initially detected 40-marker QTL intervals were considered for the concordance analysis.

The intercontinental correlation of these two successions is made possible due to the recognition of marker intervals.

Thus, we identified 38 ethnically different marker intervals (Table 3).

We also determined 95% confidence intervals of genetic distances of the adjacent marker intervals.

Multiple-interval mapping (MIM) analyzes multiple marker intervals simultaneously to fit multiple putative QTLs.

For those marker intervals and ten surrounding intervals, the posterior probability was averaged across replicates.

The total map length was 5,093.12 cM, with an average marker interval of 0.38 cM when considering all markers, 0.97 cM per nr marker, and 1.86 cM per locus.

Furthermore, when interval change of a biological marker is considered to be of prognostic value for a specific clinical setting, the LSC of a marker should be taken into account while interpreting the results.