Sentence examples for marker density achieved from inspiring English sources

The much higher marker density achieved in our study allowed for the detection of more COs, especially COs separated by shorter distances.

On average, the genetic map has a marker every 0.68 cM, which is in line with the marker density achieved using the apple 8K SNP array (0.5 cM/marker in Antanaviciute et al. 2012; 0.88 cM/marker in Chagne et al. 2012a).

A different prediction assessment is concerned with predicting within bi-parental populations; in maize, a prediction ability of around 0.4 with low marker density was achieved.

With an increased sample size, a higher marker density is achieved for map generation, with diminishing returns with larger sample sizes (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Here, the high average map density achieved was fully satisfying since maps were saturated with many co-segregating SNP markers, despite the low proportion of informative markers (6,000 out of 18 K) in the mapping population.

An even larger increase in DArT marker density can be achieved by deploying other methods of complexity reduction opening opportunities for rapid identification of tightly linked markers and providing a platform for positional cloning of rye genes.

In this context, the profitability of applying molecular markers strongly depends on the marker density required to achieve the intended purpose and the costs of fingerprinting at this marker density per genotype [ 40].

In the following tables and comparisons the results from fitting two latent variables for the marker densities 1Ne/M, 2Ne/M and 4Ne/M were chosen, while four latent variables were chosen for the 8Ne/M marker density scheme, since this achieved the highest correlation between TBV and EBV with PLSR.

For cultivated crops like cucumber with limited genetic diversity, development of a dense consensus map is a method of choice to increase marker density, which is usually achieved through map integration by synthesizing the information from multiple segregating populations of diverse genetic backgrounds.

While a benefit of 12% was achieved when marker density increased from 10too 100 SNP/Morgan, the benefit was only 2% when it increased from 100 to 500 SNP/Morgan.

The methods described in this article facilitate determination of sequencing depth in the context of empirically defined read depth to achieve desired marker density for genetic mapping studies.