Sentence examples for markedly inconsistent from inspiring English sources

The Philippine government's policy toward the Moro front has been markedly inconsistent, several diplomats here noted this week.

Andersen et al.'s claims of an effect of psychological intervention on survival are also markedly inconsistent with a larger literature.

The original association has been found to be restricted to children born in one village, it does not extend to cancers other than leukemia, and it is markedly inconsistent with the established body of knowledge on radiation-induced hereditary disease.

More crucially, the results of univariate analysis described below yielded markedly inconsistent results across the Dutch and Scottish cohort, raising real questions around the reliability of negative p53 immunostaining as a prognostic factor.

Moreover, our findings, which highlight markedly age-inconsistent levels of physical functioning among the youngest group of participants (50 59 years at study entry) reporting baseline abuse, suggest that investigation of the association between women's abuse exposure and physical functioning should occur before midlife.

In the subgroups of adolescents with smoking data and adults with data on pack-years associations that were the equivalent of Models 1-3 for the whole eligible sample (Tables 1- 4) were markedly different in inconsistent ways, suggesting that analyses in these subgroups may be affected by selection bias.

The objective of the outlier detection method is to identify data objects which are markedly different from or inconsistent with the normal set of data.

However, the results (perceived lightness measured by asymmetric matching) for the two experiments were markedly different, an outcome inconsistent with the claim that perceived depth alone determined the effect.

In contrast, the two studies that excluded accidents due to missing values [11], [8] reported inconsistent results and obvious clue distributions that are markedly shifted towards a higher number of clues.

Retrospective and non-randomised prospective analyses of EPP studies in MPM have produced inconsistent results with survival, mortality and morbidity rates varying markedly between studies and centres (Weder et al, 2004; Yan et al, 2009b; Lang-Lazdunski et al, 2012).

Where EIA data differ markedly from TCEQ data and were judged less reliable, that is, highly inconsistent with other plants within the same generator/cooling category, then TCEQ estimates were used.