Sentence examples for markedly higher estimates from inspiring English sources

Quite predictably, a neutral screening question (e.g. "have you had headache/migraine…") will give markedly higher estimates than questions specifying some degree/severity/frequency of headache suffering (e.g. "have you suffered from headache/migraine", "have you had severe headache…?", "have you had repeated episodes of headache…?", etc).

For example, in South Korean women, markedly higher estimates across ages (51%-61 51%-61 reported by Cui et al. [ 44] compared to Shin et al. (29%-48%) [ 50].

The overall results from these ad hoc methods were substantially different from those based on the MI method (Table 2), resulting in markedly higher estimates for the mean logarithmic APE concentrations in both periods and for the association between APE concentrations and the presence of symptoms.

Further, a comparison between the sum score approach and a combined variance decomposition/item response theory (IRT) measurement model approach (van den Berg et al. 2007) on attention problems resulted in markedly higher heritability estimates with the latter.

Younger and older individuals (<25 years, VE = 50%; 40+ years, VE = 55%) exhibited a markedly higher VE estimate than those 25 29 years (VE = −6%) or 30 39 years (VE = 9%) (Table 3).

The prevalence that we observed was also markedly higher than the estimates reported in a previous Mexican study where women living with men having ARPs had a prevalence of depression of 8% (Medina-Mora, 2001).

Based on the data of Boffetta et al. [ 1], our combined estimate is 1.57 (1.09–2.25), agreeing with their 1.6 (1.1 2.2), but markedly higher than the estimate based on our data, of 1.07 (0.71.0760).

Our study shows a prevalence rate for ESKD markedly higher than rates estimated for the Mediterranean region of 312 to 352 pmp [ 10, 11] despite similar demographic and socioeconomic characteristics between Libya and neighbouring countries.

The latter difference is suggested by the markedly higher 30-day mortality estimates in the other studies (7 10% as opposed to 1.38% in the present study) (Cohen et al. 2005, Moon et al. 2007).

This is markedly higher than the combined estimate of 1.36 (1.04–1.77) based on the RRs we included.

The present cost estimates are markedly higher than those by Borget et al. (2011) [ 19] and Abramowitz et al. (2010) [ 20] but similar to US cost estimates from Hu and Goldie (2008) [ 21].