marked paucity

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "marked paucity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant or noticeable lack of something, often in a formal or academic context. Example: "The study revealed a marked paucity of research on the long-term effects of the medication."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

There is a marked paucity of Israeli flags and no settler-slogan banners bedeck the streets.

The Guardian

There is a marked paucity of Israeli flags and no settler-slogan banners bedeck the streets.

The Guardian

Consistent with the Cby expression pattern, airway ciliated cells exhibit a marked paucity of motile cilia with apparent failure of basal body docking.

Plosone

Cby−/− mice show a marked paucity of motile cilia in the nasal epithelium [23] as well as in the airway epithelium (Figure 7).

Plosone

A marked paucity of M1 serotype (1.2%) was detected.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

There is a marked paucity of data regarding the treatment of patients with LADA.

Diabetic Medicine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Schizophrenia is a severe, pervasive mental disorder that is characterized by positive symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions and disorganized speech in addition to negative symptoms including marked apathy, paucity of speech, and blunting or incongruity of emotional responses.

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

Although a substantial number of nonmarked families is expected by chance given their paucity in the genome (18% of all genes), mostly nonmarked (0 20%) as well as mostly marked (80 100% marked genes) gene families were significantly overrepresented (P < 0.001, permutation test; expected values are averages of 1,000 permutations of H3K27me3 among all families) (fig. 1 B).

Genome Biology and Evolution

The mitochondria from these cells showed reduced mass and interconnectivity, a paucity of cristae, a marked reduction in OXPHOS and structural and functional defects in ETC Complexes I and V. High rates of abortive mitochondrial fusion were observed, likely reflecting ongoing, but ultimately futile, attempts to normalize mitochondrial mass.

Cell Death and Disease

In a landscape of policy debate marked by polarized views, bitter protests, and a paucity of empirical data and analysis, this volume demystifies the linkages between trade and environment.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

These sustainability challenges are marked by extreme complexity, urgency, conflicting demands, and often a paucity of resources or political will to address them.

Stanford University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "marked paucity" to denote a significant or noticeable lack of something, particularly in formal writing and scientific contexts. It is more emphatic than simply saying "lack" or "scarcity".

Common error

Avoid using "marked paucity" in casual conversation or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "significant lack" or "noticeable scarcity" for better clarity and appropriateness.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "marked paucity" is to act as a noun phrase, specifically denoting a significant or noticeable lack of something. As Ludwig AI points out, it's grammatically sound and frequently used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

63%

News & Media

28%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "marked paucity" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase that describes a significant lack or scarcity. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It is most commonly found in scientific, news, and academic contexts, signaling a formal tone. While effective in these settings, simpler alternatives like "significant lack" or "noticeable scarcity" may be more appropriate for informal communication. Understanding its formal register and typical usage patterns helps writers effectively incorporate "marked paucity" into their vocabulary.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

noticeable scarcity

Replaces "paucity" with "scarcity" and "marked" with "noticeable", emphasizing the observable lack.

significant lack

Uses "lack" instead of "paucity" and "significant" instead of "marked" simplifying the language.

distinct absence

Substitutes "paucity" with "absence" and "marked" with "distinct", highlighting the clear non-existence.

clear shortage

Replaces "paucity" with "shortage" and "marked" with "clear", suggesting an insufficient amount is available.

considerable deficit

Uses "deficit" instead of "paucity" and "considerable" instead of "marked", implying a shortfall.

obvious deficiency

Substitutes "paucity" with "deficiency" and "marked" with "obvious", indicating a readily apparent inadequacy.

pronounced inadequacy

Replaces "paucity" with "inadequacy" and "marked" with "pronounced", emphasizing the strong insufficiency.

striking dearth

Uses "dearth" instead of "paucity" and "striking" instead of "marked", highlighting a conspicuous lack.

evident undersupply

Substitutes "paucity" with "undersupply" and "marked" with "evident", suggesting a clear lack of sufficient supply.

notable insufficiency

Replaces "paucity" with "insufficiency" and "marked" with "notable", pointing out a remarkable inadequacy.

FAQs

How can I use "marked paucity" in a sentence?

You can use "marked paucity" to describe a significant lack of something. For example, "There is a "marked paucity" of data regarding the treatment of patients with LADA."

What phrases are similar to "marked paucity"?

Alternatives to "marked paucity" include "noticeable scarcity", "significant lack", and "distinct absence".

Is "marked paucity" appropriate for informal writing?

While grammatically correct, "marked paucity" is more suitable for formal or academic writing. For informal contexts, consider using simpler terms like "significant lack" or "clear shortage".

What's the difference between "marked paucity" and "slight scarcity"?

"Marked paucity" indicates a notable and substantial lack, while "slight scarcity" suggests a minor shortage. The choice depends on the degree of lack you want to convey.