marked negative effect

USAGE SUMMARY

"marked negative effect" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to describe a significant or noticeable adverse impact of something. An example: "The new policy had a marked negative effect on employee morale." Alternative expressions include "significant adverse effect" and "pronounced negative impact."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

After 12 months removal of all slash material (R) had a marked negative effect on total biomass (5.9 t ha−1 vs a mean of 7.2 t ha−1 for the other treatments).

Forest Ecology and Management

reveal a marked negative effect on intrinsic connectivity in several networks that have not typically been investigated.

Brain

The number of red foxes harvested in year t-1 had a marked negative effect on the number of European brown hares harvested the following year (Table 2), whereas red fox number in year t seemed unimportant for the European brown hare numbers.

BMC Ecology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Our results showed that frailty in older subjects had marked negative effects on the eight dimensions of the SF-36.

BioMed Research International

Targeting IGF-1 as part of an anti-fibrotic strategy is thus likely to have marked negative effects on cardiac function.

Fibrogenesis and Tissue Repair

Our results showed that frailty in older subjects living alone had marked negative effects on the eight dimensions of the SF-36.

BMC Public Health

neg skew#; marked negative skew.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Frequent resightings and behavioural observations of marked birds suggest that handling and marking had no negative effects and did not elicit suspicious behaviour.

Animal Behaviour

We found strong empirical evidence that generic substitution and regressive pharmacy mark-ups have a negative effect on originator drug prices.

Health Economics Review

The Oxford report concludes that this form of marking "could be reduced without any negative effect on student progress".

The Guardian

Mandatory generic substitution and regressive pharmacist mark-ups have a strong negative effect on originator prices, indicating the competition effect of generics on originators, as the originator price may adjust to competition in order to keep part of the market.

Health Economics Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "marked negative effect" when you want to emphasize a noticeable and significant adverse impact. It's stronger than a simple "negative effect".

Common error

Avoid using "marked negative effect" in casual conversations or informal writing. The phrase is more appropriate for formal reports, scientific papers, and news articles.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "marked negative effect" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as the object or complement in a sentence. It describes something that has a clear and adverse impact.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

66%

News & Media

34%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "marked negative effect" is a phrase used to describe a significant and noticeable adverse impact, primarily found in scientific and news-related contexts. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. While the phrase is accurate and clearly understood, its formality makes it less suited for casual conversation. Consider alternatives like "significant adverse impact" or "pronounced detrimental influence" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Its rarity suggests it should be used deliberately to emphasize the severity of the negative outcome.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

strong negative impact

Uses "strong" to indicate the intensity of the negative effect.

major adverse effect

Uses "major" to emphasize the scale of the adverse effect.

significant adverse impact

Replaces "marked" with "significant" and "effect" with "impact", both implying a considerable influence.

pronounced detrimental influence

Substitutes "negative" with "detrimental" and "effect" with "influence", emphasizing harm or damage.

substantial adverse consequence

Uses "adverse consequence" instead of "negative effect", highlighting the result or outcome.

distinct negative outcome

Replaces "marked" with "distinct" to indicate the effect is easily distinguishable.

noticeable damaging outcome

Replaces "marked" with "noticeable", focusing on the ease of observation, and uses "damaging outcome" for "negative effect".

considerable negative repercussions

Employs "repercussions" to suggest indirect or unforeseen negative consequences.

evident unfavorable outcome

Uses "evident" to emphasize the clarity of the effect and "unfavorable outcome" as a more general term.

clear adverse result

Replaces "marked" with "clear", stressing the unambiguous nature of the negative outcome.

FAQs

How to use "marked negative effect" in a sentence?

You can use "marked negative effect" to describe a significant and noticeable adverse impact. For example, "The budget cuts had a "marked negative effect" on the quality of education."

What can I say instead of "marked negative effect"?

You can use alternatives like "significant adverse impact", "pronounced detrimental influence", or "substantial adverse consequence" depending on the context.

Is "marked negative effect" the same as "negative effect"?

"Marked negative effect" implies a more noticeable or significant impact than a general "negative effect". The former emphasizes the clarity and strength of the adverse outcome.

Which is correct, "marked negative effect" or "markedly negative effect"?

"Markedly negative effect" is also grammatically correct, where "markedly" acts as an adverb modifying "negative". However, "marked negative effect" is more concise and commonly used. Both are valid but might subtly alter the emphasis.