"marked improvement to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a notable positive change in something, for example: "The company saw a marked improvement to their fortune after the introduction of their new product line."
28 We measured global improvement on a five point Likert scale ("marked improvement" to "marked worsening") and visual analogue scale (−100 mm=much worse, 0=same, 100=completely better).
The CIBIC-Plus is a 7-point scale used to assess the global clinical status of a patient, with scores ranging from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked worsening); raters are blinded to data from other post-baseline rating instruments and safety measures and do not have access to prior post-baseline CIBIC-Plus ratings [ 18].
"It is certainly a marked improvement to be able to communicate visually as well as verbally".
It's a marked improvement to 8.02 lecture". Basu passed all his classes his first term at MIT before tangling with 8.02 the second semester of his freshman year.
Meanwhile, Bulgari also showed marked improvement to rise to number three in the annual survey, conducted by Gartner L2, a business intelligence and research firm that benchmarks the digital performance of consumer brands.
We made a marked improvement to the protocol by providing a series of strategies that address all the identified bottlenecks.
This indicates that the alleviation of psoriatic symptoms, as determined by clinical assessments, results in significant and marked improvements to the dermatology-specific HRQL of psoriasis patients.
Of particular interest are 15 countries with marked improvements to their method mixes, which show patterns that may suggest potential program actions for other countries wishing to adjust the mix.
Another transcript profiling method which has been used to interogate ES cell transcriptome and offers a marked improvement compared to those techniques is Gene Identification Signature (GIS) analysis [ 11].
This result represents a marked improvement relative to the results of the original 1986 study of replication.
All patients were assessed for Clinical Global Impression of Change (GCIC) determined on a 7-point scale from marked improvement (1) to marked deterioration (7) with no change representing a score of 4 (Guy, 1976).
