Although depressive symptoms are not a direct measure of psychosocial stress, researchers argue that depressive symptoms may mark group differences in psychosocial stress and psychological health (Aneshensel et al. 1991; Mirowsky and Ross 2003).
Marked group differences were found especially in the first rank of therapy recommendations.
Significant differences between the marked groups: a = wrist fracture patients vs. control group, b = hip fracture patient vs. control group, and c = wrist fracture patients vs. hip fracture patients.
However, the group by group analysis did not indicate marked differences between groups within each country, which indicates that unless there have been very different mechanisms influencing the group leaders' decision to participate in the two countries, the groups at least can be expected to represent the same type of GPs in both countries.
Interventions may need to be tailored to meet the needs of different practitioner groups, as there are marked differences between the groups of practitioners.
Of the four commonest tumour groups, marked differences were noted between the proportions of breast cancer patients referred urgently (969; 77.5%) compared with colorectal (543; 50.6%) and prostate cancer patients (391; 44.7%).
Individual risk scores were calculated using a simple panel of six immunohistochemical markers (in addition to tumour size and nodal status), and when patients were stratified by risk into four quartiles, marked differences in group relapse rates were observed.
Notably, people working in the health sector reported lower scores compared with those in the service industry.> -wrap-foot> a R = 0.2486 b R = 0.6309 c R = 0.1212 d Only variables statistically significant are shown * p <0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001 The three user groups exhibited marked attitudinal differences in several survey items (Tables 1, 3, and 4).
This heterosis effect might be explained by the better combination of underlying production traits, i.e. bunch number and average weight, that exhibited marked differences between heterotic groups, with group A palms having a low number of big bunches and group B palms having a high number of small bunches.
Although there was no difference at flexion contracture angle in two groups, marked difference was found at flexion angle 123.8° in the group of lateral approach versus 109° in the group of medial approach (p < 0.001).
