Sentence examples for marked group differences from inspiring English sources

Marked group differences were found especially in the first rank of therapy recommendations.

We did not adjust for baseline values, because we found no marked group differences.

As seen in Table  2 there were marked group differences between participants with ADHD and HC in symptom ratings.

There were no marked group differences (PNZ < 0.75) in the maximum parameter governing stimulus stickiness (d c) or the rate parameter governing side stickiness (τ l).

As predicted there were marked group differences: the high hallucination prone group reported more psychosis-like experiences at both baseline and in sensory deprivation.

There were no marked group differences in levels of S100B, no major imbalance in the ratios of pro- to anti-inflammatory interleukins nor in the metabolism of kynurenine to toxic metabolites in ADHD.

Despite these marked between-group differences in the effectiveness of pain reduction no between-group differences were observed for the mechanical (stopping time and distance) or neuromuscular (EMG onset latency) response to sudden trunk perturbation.

Our rationale was that people with a history of common mental health problems such as PTSD are likely to suffer from compromised WMC resources in emotional contexts, compared to healthy individuals in ways that are more marked than any such group differences manifest in valence-neutral contexts.

The ellipses in the bi-plots of Figure 2, which represent the variance-covariance structure of the projected data points comprising the four groups, show marked differences across groups at each time and across times for each group.

Multiple subsequent studies have confirmed the marked difference of Group 3 from Groups 1 and 2. The few sequence comparisons that have been reported have found approximately 98 99% nucleotide identity between Groups 1 and 2 (Baruch et al. 1996; Cooper et al. 2007), but for Group 3, some regions vary so much that they cannot be easily aligned with Groups 1 or 2 (Baruch et al. 1996).

Patient characteristics were generally well balanced among the five groups, with no marked differences among treatment groups (Table 1) except for height, body weight and presence/absence of neuropathy or hypertension, which were unbalanced among the five groups at p < 0.15.