marked for comparison

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "marked for comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been designated or highlighted for the purpose of being compared with something else. Example: "The samples were marked for comparison to ensure accurate analysis of the results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The Xp_G6 chromosome harbors fewer pseudogenes than the chromosomes of Xn, Xb and Xd, and this difference was particularly marked for the comparison with the 4.4 Mb chromosome of Xn, which is particularly rich in pseudogenes.

Genome Biology and Evolution

Well, on the open sea, looking through a periscope without reference marks for comparison, the view is non-Euclidean.

Los Angeles Times

Although the latest WHO strategy for prevention of blindness for 2014 2019 encourages member states to conduct local planning and target setting [ 4] in this situation analysis we followed the earlier Vision 2020 framework because the universal eye care approach has not yet been implemented in Iran and provides some bench marks for comparison.

BMC Health Services Research

All were marked for United Russia.

The New York Times

The result for uncorrelated photons, g 2 = 1, is marked (dashed line) for comparison.

EPJ Quantum Technology

Numerical results presented for parametric effects, such as length-to-thickness ratio and radius-to-thickness ratio, should serve as a bench mark for future comparison.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Numerical results presented for various parametric effects such as length-to-thickness ratio, radius-to-thickness ratio, aspect ratio, and major-to-minor modulus ratio, etc., should serve as a bench mark for future comparison.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Before stocking, a sample of fry was collected for each selection trial to ensure that different banding schemes were distinguishable and to provide a library of reference marks for later comparison.

Evolutionary Applications

Bite mark analysis is used for comparison between bite marks on a bitten object and the suspects' teeth.

Archives of Oral Biology

As a benchmark for comparison, we have marked with bullets the proteins identified by our approach in each STRING-based module.

BMC Systems Biology

In fact, the morphology visible in hawthorn flowering and fruiting voucher specimens is adequate for identification of most western North American species (Dickinson 2012) because, being long-lived woody perennials, wild hawthorns are readily marked and vouchered at both seasons for comparison (Hildreth et al. 2007).

AoB PLANTS

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "marked for comparison", ensure that the items being compared are clearly defined and that the basis for comparison is explicit. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures the comparison is meaningful.

Common error

Avoid using "marked for comparison" without clearly stating what is being compared and the criteria for comparison. Providing insufficient context can render the phrase meaningless.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "marked for comparison" functions as a descriptor, indicating that something has been identified or designated for the specific purpose of being compared with something else. It highlights the intent to perform a comparative analysis.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "marked for comparison" serves to indicate that something has been selected or designated for the purpose of being compared with something else. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct. Although relatively simple, the phrase is more frequently seen in science, news and media, and formal/business related contents. When using "marked for comparison", clarify what items will be subject to the comparison and what your comparison criteria are to prevent ambiguity and improve the purpose of using this designation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

designated for comparison

Uses "designated" to emphasize the act of formally assigning something for comparison.

identified for comparison

Uses "identified" to highlight the recognition and selection of something for comparison.

selected for comparison

Uses "selected" to emphasize the choice made to include something in a comparison.

chosen for comparative analysis

Uses "chosen" to highlight a decision was made in order to proceed with comparative analysis.

set aside for comparison

Uses "set aside" to indicate something has been reserved specifically for comparison.

flagged for comparison

Uses "flagged" to suggest something has been marked as important and should be considered for comparison.

earmarked for comparison

Uses "earmarked" to imply something has been allocated or designated specifically for comparison.

distinguished for comparison

Uses "distinguished" to suggest that something is different and worth comparing.

highlighted for comparison

Uses "highlighted" to emphasize that something has been brought to attention to further compare.

specified for comparison

Uses "specified" to emphasize that the thing has been clearly named or identified for the goal of comparing.

FAQs

How can I use "marked for comparison" in a sentence?

You can use "marked for comparison" to indicate that certain items or data points have been specifically chosen to be compared with others. For example, "The control group was "designated for comparison" with the experimental group".

What can I say instead of "marked for comparison"?

You can use alternatives like ""designated for comparison"", "identified for comparison", or "selected for comparison" depending on the context.

When should I use "marked for comparison" over other similar phrases?

Use "marked for comparison" when you want to emphasize that something has been physically or symbolically marked or flagged to indicate that is meant for comparison with some other subject/group.

What's the difference between "designated for comparison" and "marked for comparison"?

"Designated for comparison" implies a formal assignment for comparison, while "marked for comparison" suggests a physical or symbolic marking to indicate that something is meant for comparison. The first suggests a formal action, the second one an informal action, and very frequently physical.