marked divergences

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "marked divergences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe significant differences or variations in data, opinions, or characteristics in a particular context. Example: "The study revealed marked divergences in the participants' responses to the survey questions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

The euro may have abolished market-based nominal exchange rates but it has led to marked divergences in real exchange rates (see chart).

The Economist

First, in the realm of hedonic evaluation, there are marked divergences between the aggregate sums of in-the-moment pleasures and pains and ex post memories of pleasures and pains.

SEP

Sequencing of bvgA and bvgS from a number of isolates revealed that BvgA is almost invariant, while BvgS shows marked divergences between phylogenetic groups.

Plosone

Finally, the recorded phenotypic, biological and pathogenic differences between Brucella and Ochrobactrum, strengthens arguments for maintaining these two bacterial clusters as separate genera in the Brucellaceae and reinforce the concept that non-drastic molecular variations generate marked divergences that result in different biological groups.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Secondly, this review highlights marked divergence over management, between patient and doctor.

BMC Family Practice

Unique habitat characteristics of island beaches have likely driven this marked divergence (additional file 3).

BMC Evolutionary Biology

As expected, there was marked divergence revealed by Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) between the HpaII and MspI profiles in all untreated samples.

BMC Plant Biology

In contrast, other amino acid positions predicted to form contact sites in the ligand binding pocket show marked divergence within the zebrafish receptor family.

BMC Genomics

Most notable similarities were: (1) marked divergence between South American haplotypes from those in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, and (2) north-south equatorial transgressions in the Pacific Ocean with (3) a putative ancestor in the North Pacific.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

In addition, this model predicts that there should be marked divergence between African and non-African strains, particularly for X-linked loci, due to increased rates of adaptation in derived strains.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

With respect to the predicted pattern of the genetic variation, GDM revealed marked divergence between the regions east and west of the Andes, which is consistent with large observed genetic differences across this mountain range.

Evolutionary Applications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "marked divergences" to describe situations where differences are not only present but also significant enough to warrant attention. It's suitable for academic, scientific, or formal writing where precision is valued.

Common error

Avoid using "marked divergences" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler terms like "big differences" or "noticeable variations" are more appropriate for everyday language.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "marked divergences" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence or clause. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically sound and suitable for describing noticeable differences.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

12%

Encyclopedias

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "marked divergences" is a noun phrase used to describe significant and noticeable differences, primarily in formal and scientific contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. While less common in everyday language, it serves as a precise way to highlight substantial variations. Alternatives like "significant differences" or "notable variations" may be more appropriate for informal settings. The phrase's frequent appearance in science-related articles emphasizes its suitability for technical or academic discussions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant differences

Replaces "marked" with "significant", emphasizing the importance of the differences.

notable variations

Uses "notable" instead of "marked", highlighting the visibility or recognizability of the variations.

distinct discrepancies

Employs "distinct" and "discrepancies" to suggest clear and noticeable inconsistencies.

pronounced dissimilarities

Substitutes "marked" with "pronounced" and "divergences" with "dissimilarities", focusing on the obviousness of the lack of similarity.

clear contrasts

Uses simpler terms to convey the idea of easily observable differences.

evident disparities

Replaces the original terms with synonyms that emphasize the obvious and unequal nature of the differences.

substantial deviations

Focuses on the extent to which things differ or stray from a norm.

obvious variations

Emphasizes the readily apparent nature of the differences.

conspicuous differences

Highlights how the differences stand out and are easily noticed.

striking dissimilarities

Uses "striking" to indicate that the dissimilarities are particularly impressive or noticeable.

FAQs

How can I use "marked divergences" in a sentence?

You can use "marked divergences" to highlight significant differences between sets of data, opinions, or characteristics. For example, "The study revealed marked divergences in the participants' responses to the survey questions".

What are some alternatives to "marked divergences"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "significant differences", "notable variations", or "distinct discrepancies".

Is it more appropriate to say "marked divergences" or "significant differences"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "marked divergences" is slightly more formal and often used in academic or scientific contexts. "Significant differences" is a broader term suitable for various situations.

What distinguishes "marked divergences" from "minor differences"?

"Marked divergences" indicate substantial and noteworthy differences, while "minor differences" suggest only small or insignificant variations. The choice depends on the magnitude and importance of the differences being described.