marked abstruseness

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "marked abstruseness" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant level of obscurity or difficulty in understanding something, often in academic or literary contexts. Example: "The author's marked abstruseness in the text left many readers confused and frustrated."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

No marked bills.

The New Yorker

It was marked "Trust Account".

The New York Times

"I marked it".

The New Yorker

Graffiti marked the walls.

The New York Times

Determination marked her days.

The New Yorker

Ásmundr Kári' son marked".

Wikipedia

Marked mode displays marked photos only.

WikiHow

Target marked down items.

WikiHow

Drill where you marked.

WikiHow

That marks a change.

The Economist

And mark your calendars.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "marked abstruseness", ensure that the context clearly establishes the subject being described and the reason for its difficulty or obscurity. This phrase is most effective when highlighting a significant or unusual level of complexity.

Common error

Avoid using "marked abstruseness" when simpler terms like "complexity" or "obscurity" would suffice. This phrase is best reserved for situations where the level of abstruseness is particularly noteworthy or requires specific emphasis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "marked abstruseness" functions as a noun phrase where "marked" acts as an adjective modifying "abstruseness". It specifies a particular degree or characteristic of something being difficult to understand. Ludwig AI validates its usability but indicates infrequent usage.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "marked abstruseness" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe a significant level of obscurity or difficulty in understanding something. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its validity, though notes its infrequent usage. It's best suited for formal and scientific contexts where precision is valued. While less common in everyday language, the phrase can effectively emphasize the notable complexity of a subject. Consider alternatives such as ""pronounced obscurity"" or "significant esotericism" to better suit the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

pronounced obscurity

Emphasizes the degree of obscurity but uses a different adjective.

notable ambiguity

Focuses on the lack of clarity rather than difficulty, but still implies a challenge in understanding.

considerable complexity

Highlights the intricate nature of the subject, leading to difficulty in understanding.

high degree of unintelligibility

Rephrases the concept with a more formal and descriptive tone.

obvious impenetrability

Suggests that something is impossible to understand, emphasizing the barrier to comprehension.

striking opaqueness

Uses a metaphorical description to convey the lack of transparency in meaning.

evident incomprehensibility

Indicates that the difficulty in understanding is easily noticeable.

unmistakable reconditeness

Highlights the esoteric or obscure nature of the subject matter.

significant esotericism

Emphasizes the specialized or niche nature of the knowledge required to understand something.

distinct abstrusity

Uses a less common noun form of "abstruse" to describe the quality of being difficult to understand.

FAQs

How can I use "marked abstruseness" in a sentence?

You can use "marked abstruseness" to describe something that is notably difficult to understand due to its complexity or obscurity. For example, "The author's writing was characterized by a "pronounced obscurity", making it difficult for many readers to grasp the central themes".

What are some alternatives to "marked abstruseness"?

Alternatives include phrases like "significant esotericism", "considerable complexity", or "notable ambiguity", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to use "marked abstruseness" or "significant abstruseness"?

Both "marked abstruseness" and "significant abstruseness" are grammatically correct, but "marked" implies a more noticeable or pronounced level of abstruseness. The choice depends on the degree of emphasis you want to place on the difficulty of understanding. "Significant" is also a good "alternative to" "marked".

What kind of writing benefits from using the phrase "marked abstruseness"?

The phrase "marked abstruseness" is most suitable for academic, literary, or philosophical writing where complex and obscure concepts are being discussed. It is less appropriate for everyday conversation or informal writing.