Sentence examples for mark comparison from inspiring English sources

Bite mark comparison is often used in criminal prosecutions; however, the bite mark testimony continues to be criticized for lacking scientific studies that support this type of assessment (Committee 2009).

Autopsy critics point to questionable forensic methodology such as bullet lead comparison, dog scent lineups, bite mark comparison, and even fingerprint and DNA analysis.

Chaney was exonerated last October when state district judge Dominique Collins agreed with Chaney's attorneys that the bite mark comparisons linking him to the crime were fundamentally unsound.

In each of these "HAT-acetylation mark" comparisons, variations in acetylation levels between different categories of loci can be observed, but with the same patterns for all the residues tested (except for histone H2AK5ac, H3K14ac and H3K23ac for which the antibodies used in the ChIP may have been too weak for the analysis).

The MF-resistant phenotype of AS-ATNMF1 was very marked in comparison to the remaining clones (Figure 3C).

The interrogative mood of a typical yes/no question in German (6) is marked, in comparison to its declarative counterpart, by coding the finite verb in the sentence initial position: Das Telefon ist hinten.

The tumour area was marked by comparison with the corresponding H&E-stained slide.

We were unable to find specific differences in genomic location, sequence content, sequence conservation, or histone marks, in comparison to tDMPs for other tissues.

After preparation of a 20 µm thick section from the formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sample, the area of tumour cells was marked by comparison with the corresponding HE-stained slide.

The displacement of the material also explains the larger diameter of the perforation marks in comparison to the size of the holes in the sieve while still avoiding contact.

Significant differences were also found in the arousal, lubrication, satisfaction, and orgasm domains (p = 0.048, p = 0.012, p = 0.035, and p = 0.018 respectively), and were particularly marked upon comparison to the scores of women with a secondary-level education (Table 6).