Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
By a 2-1 margin, people think the government is incompetent.
Some of us had fun with the Business Insider poll finding that by a large margin, people who thought they knew something about the fiscal cliff believed that it would increase, not reduce, the deficit.
As I've tried to explain in various ways, the hallmark of such a trap is that at the margin people hold money not for its moneyness but simply as a store of value, and that therefore conventional monetary policy — which involves swapping money for non-money assets like Treasury bills — has no effect, because it's just replacing one zero-interest asset with another.
The liberal writer Thomas Frank makes such a case in his recent best-selling polemic, "What's the Matter With Kansas?" In return for voting Republican by a wide margin, people in the poorest counties in the Great Plains get nothing economically, he argues, because no matter what the Republicans promise, their fiscal policies favor the rich.
If you win by a large margin people expect it.
By a 2 to 1 margin, people said that if marijuana were legalized, they would favor allowing the government to tax sales of marijuana.
Similar(53)
And, by widening margins, people say they are less trusting that Mr. Bush will keep his word.
"That mission involved dealing with people who are on the margins, people who don't have power".
Your June 21 front-page article on the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll about President Bush reported that "by widening margins, people say they are less trusting that Mr. Bush will keep his word".
Talk about adding insult to injury: not only do TVs have low margins, people hardly ever buy them.
By large margins, people want us reduce the deficit by asking those who have benefited most over the past few decades to pay their fair share, and they recognize that cutting Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security benefits will only make our problems worse.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com