Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
For other cancer sites, exposure maps were generally much simpler with fewer or no overlapping exposures.
The maps were generally well received, although no formal follow-up of opinions or outcomes has been possible to date.
Pair-wise Spearman rank correlations rho of marker order between the consensus and the single component maps were generally very high across chromosomes.
Unfolded maps were generally reconstructed from sections at 800 μm intervals, but smaller (400 μm) or larger (1600 μm) intervals were also used in some cases to complete the map or when a section was missing, respectively.
QTLs detected on parental maps were generally also detected on the consensus map except for skin concP, concK, catEx, galEx, epiT, F3pr35 and seed concP where additional QTLs were identified through parental detection (Additional file 6).
To obtain an integrated map of a cross pollinated population, individual parental maps were generally constructed and then integrated to produce a consensus map of the population by estimation of the average recombination frequency of the loci in the two parents, as has been used for other pseudo-test cross mapping populations in many tree species [ 38- 40].
Similar(53)
The total marker number on these maps is generally limited and some of the mapped markers have no sequence information.
Although some genetic maps for grapes already exist, the total marker number on the linkage groups (LGs) of these existing maps is generally < 1,000 and some of these mapped markers have no sequence information.
People are coming to understand, for instance, that online maps are generally good with large thoroughfares but not particularly adept at navigating through small urban streets.
Its city maps are generally easy to read with their attractive palette of colors and typefaces that enhance legibility (see Manhattan on KeyPage 81, for example).
Google Maps was generally quicker; at times, its voice commands arrived as much as three seconds sooner, which could make all the difference if your reflexes are not that snappy.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com