Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The predicted deforestation maps are validated with the map of real forest loss of 1985–1991.
LCC prediction maps are validated based on temporal series of multispectral SPOT images.
Similar(58)
The two GWPI maps were validated using reservoir operating characteristics curves.
Predictive parent material maps were validated through comparisons with legacy soil survey maps and 307 field points.
Three maps were validated independently using forest inventory plots that were not used for model calibration (Fig. 15).
The new and original maps were validated with field data from 123 locations selected with a stratified simple random sampling design.
The resulting GSH maps were validated using area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis with the subsidence area data that had not been used for training the model.
Finally, the improvement of the prediction of strain maps was validated by performing a tensile test on another non-standard sample [2] which was not included in the identification protocol.
The precision of the constructed maps was validated with a clear statistical criterion.
The genome maps were validated by the alignment with draft genome sequences.
Finally, the result of groundwater potential map derived from belief map was validated using testing data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com