Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(26)
The value of these resources to Dashboard users justifies the ongoing maintenance of the mappings that is required to support the link-outs.
So it is quite surprising that recently, in [1] there was obtained a strong convergence method for nonexpansive mappings that is 'almost' the Mann method (the difference is given only by a smaller and smaller amount).
Then we will construct a sequence of mappings that is not naturally a scheme, but surprisingly yields similar retraction and contractibility results for the fixed point set of a certain nonexpansive set-valued mapping.
Note that the class of κ-strict pseudo-contractions strictly includes the class of nonexpansive mappings, that is T is nonexpansive if and only if T is 0-strict pseudo-contractive.
Finally, we construct a sequence of mappings that is not a fixed point iteration scheme, but still induces retraction and contractibility results for the fixed point set of a certain nonexpansive set-valued mapping.
The following construction, motivated by the iteration process (1.3) in [12], indicates that there is a sequence of mappings that is not naturally a scheme, but still gives rise to a retraction result as well as a contractibility criterion for the fixed point set of a certain nonexpansive set-valued mapping.
Similar(34)
We consider mapped multiblock domains for mappings that are conforming at inter-block boundaries.
To improve the quality of the mate pair mappings, we filter the mappings so that we only keep mappings that are consistent with other mate pairs mapping to approximately the same location.
Given two pathway representations, we need to formalize the types of mappings that are allowed under the one-to-many mapping restrictions.
There exist quasi-nonexpansive mappings that are not nonexpansive.
We conclude with an application of Theorem 6.4 to mappings that are not necessarily continuous.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com