Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(26)
Let be a sequence of mappings defined as Lemma 2.1.
Consider the pair of mappings defined as (2.1).
Let, let be a sequence of mappings defined as in Lemma 2.1, and let.
Put for every Let and let be a sequence of mappings defined as in Lemma 2.1.
Let { Q β n } be a sequence of mappings defined as in Lemma 2.1.
Let and let be a sequence of mappings defined as in Lemma 2.2.
Similar(34)
Let T i : X 3 → X be mapping defined as T i ( x, y, z ) = x + y + z 3 i ; i ∈ N and g is self-mapping defined as g ( x ) = x.
In the setting of Example 2.2, retain the same mappings and and define as with.
Sequences (or double sequences) will be understood as mappings defined on (mathbb{N}) (or (mathbb{N} timesmathbb{N})), thus avoiding as much as possible the use of subscripts or superscripts.
Then a mapping m∈?? (with 𝕄 as the set of all mappings) is defined as the tuple By this definition, a mapping m represents a combination of measurements together with its metadata and a set of attributes.
These mappings are defined as follows.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com