Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
Therefore, is contraction mapping with contraction constant.
Also, by (ii), is a contraction mapping with contraction constant.
Therefore, Q is a contraction mapping with contraction constant α < 1.
Similar(57)
Again since P Ω f : H 1 → Ω is a contraction mapping with contractive constant k ∈ ( 0, 1 ), there exists a unique x ∗ ∈ Ω such that x ∗ = P Ω f x ∗.
where f : H 1 → H 1 is a contraction mapping with a contractive constant k ∈ ( 0, 1 ), { α n }, { ξ n } and { γ n, i } are sequence in [ 0, 1 ] satisfying some conditions.
Let be a nonempty closed convex bounded subset of a real Hilbert space, a multivalued -Lipschitz continuous mapping with constant, a contraction mapping with constant.
Let be a nonempty closed convex bounded subset of a real Hilbert space, a Lipschitz continuous mapping with constant, a contraction mapping with constant.
Throughout this paper, will denote a -strongly accretive and -strictly pseudo-contractive mapping with, and is a contraction with coefficient on a Hilbert space.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space, a multivalued mapping, a contraction mapping with constant, and an -mapping generated by and, where sequence is nonexpansive.
Then (T_{1}), (T_{2}) and (T_{3}) are nonexpansive mappings, and f is a contraction mapping with constant (frac{2}{7}).
Let f C→C be a contraction mapping with constant α∈ 0,1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com