Sentence examples for mapping of classes from inspiring English sources

We can observe the mapping of classes into components by using the matching keyword.

Then, we define the mapping of classes into modules, i.e., in this step, we specify the module that represents source code classes.

Theorem 4.12 Let T : E ∗ ∗ → 2 E ∗ be a bounded mapping of class ( S + ).

Then it is easy to see that T 1 is a mapping of class ( S + ).

Proposition 4.5 Let T : D ( T ) ⊆ E ∗ ∗ → 2 E ∗ be a mapping of class ( S + ) and S : E ∗ ∗ → E ∗ be a mapping with closed convex values.

Theorem 4.11 Let T : Ω ¯ → 2 E ∗ be a mapping of class ( S + ), where Ω ⊂ E ∗ ∗ is an open bounded subset.

Lemma 4.8 Under the condition of Lemma  4.7, there exists a finite dimensional subspace F 0 of E ∗ ∗ such that deg ( T F, Ω ∩ F, 0 ) does not depend on F. Now, let Ω ⊂ E ∗ ∗ be a nonempty open bounded subset and T : Ω ¯ → 2 E ∗ be a mapping of class ( S + ).

Let (F Rtimes R^{2}rightarrow R^{2}) be a mapping of class (C^{4}) of the form (F k, x, y)= y, G k,x,y))) which satisfies: (i) For every (kin R), there exists (tilde{z} k)) such that (F k, tilde{z} k),tilde{z} k))= tilde{z} k),tilde{z} k))).

Combinations of specific primers for the conserved segments (5′CS and 3′CS) of class I integrons together with the blaVIM primers were used for PCR mapping of class I integrons, as described previously [ 19].

The output is a map of classes, in our case 50, that summarize the variation in different phenotypes or genotypes.

In addition, we tested our method on a simulated set of images containing a mixture of projections from the maps of classes 1 and 2 in Figure 3.