The physical map and other information presented here will help facilitate the long-range assembly of Aquilegia genome sequence and fine-scale mapping of QTLs as well as comparative genomic studies.
Therefore, care should be taken when interpreting these results since rote memorization of the information presented in maps might have accounted for the higher conceptual knowledge in the concept map study condition compared to the self-explanation condition.
The maps were assessed based on the organization presented between major concepts associated with tumorigenesis, the organization within these major concepts, the accuracy of the information presented, and the completeness of the map.
It reminds me, in fact, of the post-Vignelli subway map — accurate in a literal sense, but with too much information presented in no clear hierarchy of importance, so you end up feeling confused, not enlightened.
How was the information presented?
We focused on mapping information that was present in PSI-MI (some information is not covered by PSI-MI) and data found in frequently used fields (Table 2), as described below.
Less than 1% of the studies that were accepted in the first mapping cycle presented information about requiring some sort of user's interaction in their abstract.
The inliers and outliers presenting compositional overlaps within broad regolith classes were rectified from the field mapping information.
The initial focus in the present paper is therefore to integrate all available tammar wallaby mapping information to provide the "backbone" for a tammar map that is based only on tammar wallaby information.
It is all down to mapping information.
