Sentence examples for mapping in biparental from inspiring English sources

Since the advent of molecular markers, crop researchers and breeders have dedicated huge amounts of effort on QTL mapping in biparental populations and marker-assisted selection (MAS) (Chen et al. 2014a).

Still, our findings suggest that even at relatively low coverage, GBS can produce enough information for powerful QTL mapping in biparental populations.

For the purpose of QTL mapping in biparental populations, marker density can be optimized by first recognizing that adding markers to stretches of the genome that correspond to the same parental genotype does not provide additional information.

Next, we developed a theoretical tool to determine the appropriate marker number for QTL mapping in biparental populations, as well as assessed the marker number required for association mapping in diverse inbred populations.

For this type of population structure, desirable marker coverage is given by Equation 2. Representative populations suggest that the number of markers for efficient QTL mapping in biparental populations is on the order of hundreds to thousands.

Genetic mapping techniques available for bioenergy grasses include mapping Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) through linkage mapping in biparental populations [ 182], association mapping in a genetically diverse population [ 183], and nested association mapping (NAM) [ 184, 185].

Linkage-based mapping studies in biparental populations have shown that quantitative trait loci (QTL) to Fusarium ear rot resistance have relatively small effects and are not consistent between populations [ 12– 15].

Linkage-based mapping studies in biparental populations have shown that Fusarium ear rot resistance quantitative trait loci (QTL) have relatively small effects and are not consistent between populations (Pérez-Brito et al. 2001; Robertson-Hoyt et al. 2006; Ding et al. 2008; Mesterházy et al. 2012).

For linkage mapping in a biparental population with a size of hundreds, the mapping resolution is always in the 10 cM magnitude due to limited number of recombination that can be surveyed in such population sizes, not to mention that the effect sizes are usually grossly overestimated in such studies.

We found that mapping in a biparental family using high-density SNP markers can achieve gene resolution.

Alu_263_6 is 5 cM apart from the structural gene Phytoene desaturase that we mapped in the biparental DH population.