Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
After a genome-wide search for candidate regions complying with precursor secondary structure constraints, 193 mapped sequences showed to be compatible with a MIR gene locus (Additional file 4: Table S2).
Size sorting of mapped sequences showed a higher conservation of 21-nt sRNAs and lower of 24-nt, 61.6 % and 21.1 % respectively (Table 3).
Based on nr annotation and the E-value distribution, 68.5% of the mapped sequences showed strong homology (E-value < 10-20), and 32.5% were very strong homology (E-value < 10-50) to available plant sequences.
The E-value distribution of the top hits in the Nr database revealed that 41.42% of the mapped sequences showed significant homology (less than 1.0E-50 1.0E-50eandy 20% of the sequenearlyith greater than 80% similarity were found.
The E-value distribution of the top hits in the Nr database revealed that 57.39% of the mapped sequences showed significant homology (less than 1.0E-45 1.0E-451.56% and 271.56 of the sequences with similarities greater than 60% and 80%, respectively, were found.
The E-value distribution of the top hits in the Nr database revealed that 67.67 % of the mapped sequences showed significant homology (less than 1.0 E -50) while 27.63 % had an E-value between 1.0E−50 and 1.0 E−10 (Fig. 3a).
Similar(54)
Due to the lack of sequence annotation, a considerable number of mapped sequences showing high homology with cDNA sequences from other conifers could not be functionally inspected.
Hénon map sequences behave the same as Walsh sequences, where Duffing map sequences show large performance gain.
To build on our previous results, long, paired-end, uniquely mapped sequencing reads showed that lncRNA-TARE transcripts likely originated from 22 chromosome ends in our parasite populations.
The identity of mapped sequences is 98.14%, which shows a close genetic relationship between B. juncea and B. rapa (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Linking RH maps to the goat sequences showed that the assemblies of scaffolds/super-scaffolds were globally accurate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com