Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
To find out what genetic differences underlie natural variation in hermaphrodite mating frequency, we generated a panel of RILs by interbreeding the N2 and HW wild-type isolates and mapped mating frequency to SNP markers spread across the C. elegans genome (see File S2).
Similar(59)
These mapped mate-pairs defined the "true" insert length of each sequenced fragment.
Therefore, we evaluated prediction performance with two different hit matrix construction rules: once with allowing mapping pairs only and once with including mapped reads without mapped mates as well.
After removing low quality reads (mapping quality < 10 or including bases with base quality < 30), we mapped mate-paired sequence reads by bioscope software, and then used all mapped read pairs to calculate the mean and standard deviation of the distance between any two mapped reads.
To define the most-likely position of BESs that mapped to more than one location in the mouse genome, when applicable, the location of a uniquely mapped mate-pair was used to search the alternative genomic locations for one that would meet the criteria set for 'concordant' clones.
Only the forward reads (101 bp) from each pair were used, to approximate the effect of having short fragments that must be reliably mapped without mated reads.
To accurately determine the mean insert size and insert size variation of each MP library, we mapped all mate pair reads back to the 7B contigs using BWA v0.6.0 [ 29] with the parameters BWA aln –t 10 -q 10.
Common schemes for building a genetic map involve mating parents to generate a F2 intercross, F2 backcross, or recombinant inbred line mapping population.
These were then mapped onto individual mating success and moment-to-moment changes in environmental and social context.
This pattern was also observed in control pregnant mice (CBA/J x BALB/c), where the mean change in MAP from mating day decreased between days 8 and 15 in BALB/c mated CBA/J mice.
The single filter that best enriched for TPs was percentage of reads mapped using mate-pair rescue.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com