Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The results showed that 34 loci in the indica group and 91 loci in the japonica group were mapped (data not shown), suggesting that more QTLs for CTS are accumulated in the japonica cultivars than that in the indica ones.
We did not examine founder No.1 further since the BAC integration site could not be mapped (data not shown).
Lower values of W (wordsize) were attempted but made little difference to the number of ESTs mapped (data not shown).
Interestingly, H3K4me3 was detected also in region C where minor TSS were mapped (data not shown), suggesting the presence of additional transcripts in this region.
In silico analysis highlighted the presence of conserved E-boxes both in the distal (DIST) and proximal (PROX) regions as well as in the regions surrounding the second exon where minor alternative TSSs were mapped (data not shown).
The known distribution of trnC translocations was mapped (data not shown) based on the recent phylogeny of Neuropterida produced by Winterton et al., which also contains estimations of the divergence times of major phyletic lineages [ 57].
Similar(54)
So why is the flood map data not available beyond the EA site?
When it comes to the availability of good mapping data, not all parts of the world are created equal.
Comparative analysis of related genomes via MaGe synteny maps (data not shown) failed to detect a pel locus in C. pinatubonensis JMP134; however, both C. eutrophus H16 and C. taiwanensis carry a full set of seven pel genes.
The first one is that Group 2 is the descendant of Group1 and eukaryotic iGluR is descendant of Group 2, because Group 2 is closer to eukaryotic iGluR in the phylogenetic map (data not shown).
Due to inconsistencies of the reported sequence at the tip of the ITR5 hairpins between [10], the published genbank sequence (genbank accession number NC_006152), and restriction mapping (data not shown), an ITR2 hairpin was utilized for the ITR5 construct (Fig. 1A).
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com