Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
Most interestingly, this population also holds uniqueness of being the basis for development of first SSR-based genetic map for cultivated groundnut and improved version of this map now possesses 191 mapped loci (Varshney et al. 2009; Ravi et al. 2011).
Varshney et al. [ 39] constructed the first SSR linkage map for cultivated peanut.
This study was the first to develop SNP markers on a large scale to construct a genetic map for cultivated peanut.
Previously, a mapping population with 92 F2 plants from Gy14 × 9930 was used to develop a 735-locus high-density genetic map for cultivated cucumber [ 27].
However the construction of these genetic maps demonstrates the potential to produce a higher resolution genetic linkage map for cultivated peanut.
The first high density SNP-based linkage map for A. hypogaea was generated that can serve as a reference map for cultivated Arachis species and will be useful in genetic mapping.
Similar(48)
The construction of genetic linkage maps for cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). has and continues to be an important research goal to facilitate quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis and gene tagging for use in a marker-assisted selection in breeding.
Until the development of primocane-fruiting cultivars, pro-active interest in molecular marker linkage map development for cultivated blackberry has been lacking and no blackberry linkage maps have been published to date.
Hong et al. [ 15] published a SSR-based map (F4 6 RILs) for cultivated peanuts with 131 SSR and 20 linkage groups.
To examine the rice genomic methylation landscape and assess its functional significance, we generated single-base resolution DNA methylome maps for Asian cultivated rice Oryza sativa ssp.
Therefore, there is a continuing need to generate dense linkage maps for the cultivated tetraploid peanut that will not only cluster the markers into the expected 20 linkage groups to cover the haplotype chromosomes, but also to facilitate marker-trait association and eventually assist in its genetic improvement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com