Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
In general, mobility models [58 61] can be categorized into (i) map and (ii) random.
Overall, there are two time-consuming operations which could potentially be optimized, namely (i) generation of the DSPF skin map and (ii) the distance transform.
Then: (i) (varphi_{omega}colon Xmultimap X) is a Lefschetz map, and (ii) if (Lambda varphi_{omega})neq{0}), for almost all (omegainOmega), then (operatorname {Fix}^{mathrm {ra}} varphi neqemptyset). .
This package produces a map in which: (i) genes with similar data patterns self-organise to the same or nearby nodes in the map, and (ii) the distribution of genes across the 2D map is representative of the high-dimensional input space.
Two methods for map construction were used: (i) a classical approach by two point and multipoint mapping, followed by the determination of the minimal set of markers for a framework map and (ii) a comparative map approach with statistical measure of a set of maps.
The construction procedure used the following pseudo-code algorithm: (i) initialised consensus map with the seed map; and (ii) for each chromosome, we found a subset of linkage groups for this chromosome and repeated until subset was empty for each group.
Similar(51)
They jointly enable imaging of (i) microstructure-independent pattern maps and (ii) pattern-independent microstructure maps.
The significance of this work is that it: (i) provides guidance in the construction of ICP variants for terrain mapping; and (ii) identifies the significant limitations of existing ICP variants for this application.
Hence T is a weak Fan-Browder mapping, and (ii) is proved.
We developed MethylExtract, a user friendly tool to: i) generate high quality, whole genome methylation maps and ii) detect sequence variation within the same sample preparation.
At group level, this finding was consistent for both data postprocessing approaches, that is, (i) arithmetically averaging of the individual brain maps and (ii) applying a one-sample t-test (including multiple comparison correction).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com