Sentence examples for many transcripts show from inspiring English sources

Interestingly, many transcripts show stronger responses to WOS, especially in systemically induced tissues [ 48- 51].

Many transcripts showed AS motif between mature and immature cells and some illustrative examples are displayed in Supplemental Figure S2.

Many transcripts showed no significant homologies to publicly available sequences.

Overall, many transcripts showed expression differences associated with gross differences in ovary size.

Similar results were obtained previously, where many transcripts showed relatively small changes in expression level between SCC and sun-exposed skin [ 22].

Many transcripts showed maximum expression within one or two specific stages of root development relative to other stages, with all stages of development possessing distinct clusters of genes showing dominant expression within that stage.

Many of these transcripts show stop codons and frame shifts, indicating they may function as negative regulators of transposition.

In addition, many chickpea transcripts showed homology to uncharacterized proteins annotated as unknown, hypothetical and expressed proteins as well.

It can be observed however that many VviMAPKKK transcripts showed a decreased abundance at the very early time point (4hpt), a trend to a more or less pronounced increase afterwards, and a new decrease at the last collection time (72 hpt).

We further observe that within our example population, ∼2.2% of transcripts show expression variation that is due to the presence of a private TE and that many more transcript/TE pairs show a reduction in expression of at least one standard deviation.

Many of these transcripts showed expression differences spanning both pigmentation stages (Table 2, Additional file 3).