"Many scholars consider" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to introduce a statement or belief that is widely held among scholars or experts in a particular field. Example: Many scholars consider Shakespeare to be one of the greatest playwrights in history.
In light of excavations in Crete, many scholars consider that Minos was a royal or dynastic title for the priestly rulers of Bronze Age, or Minoan, Knossos.
SAEKO ICHINOHE DANCE COMPANY The earnest and venerable New York-based troupe honors what many scholars consider the thousandth anniversary of Lady Murasaki's classic novel "The Tale of Genji".
It was the subject of Dr. Silverstein's first book in 1935, and in 1997, he and Anthony Hilhorst, a Dutch scholar, cooperated on a version that many scholars consider definitive.
Many scholars consider the collection of Native American artifacts at the Smithsonian Institute's National Museum of the American Indian in New York City to be the finest in the world.
Among his projects were the Berkeley waterfront, the Alcoa Forecast Garden in Los Angeles and the 256-acre Ladera planned residential community near Palo Alto, which many scholars consider the postwar period's finest subdivision plan, although it was never completed.
The elaborate description of the Tabernacle in Exodus is believed by some to be anachronistic, for many scholars consider the narrative as having been written during or after the Babylonian Exile (586 538 bc i.e., after the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple).
Thereafter, many scholars considered the problem of applying fBm in finance in a large setting, such as Elliott and van der Hoek [6]; Elliott and Chan [7]; Guasoni [8]; Rostek [9]; Azmoodeh [10].
Many movie scholars consider it one of camp's defining texts.
Many Muslim scholars consider statues to be idolatrous, and other AK officials have not disguised their aversion to them.
The principal Supreme Court precedent in that area, which is more than 40 years old, concerns grand jury investigations, not trials, and many legal scholars consider its reasoning to be ambiguous.
Many legal scholars consider the act unconstitutional, in particular because it purports to let the legislature overrule the executive's decision through the absence of action rather than an affirmative vote.
