Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(18)
Many randomized trials involve missing binary outcomes.
Many randomized trials involve measuring a continuous outcome at baseline and after treatment.
Many randomized trials involve measuring a continuous outcome - such as pain, body weight or blood pressure - at baseline and after treatment.
Two complications in the analysis of many randomized trials for cancer screening are (a) non-attendance, whereby some subjects randomized to a screening invitation do not attend the screening, and (b) contamination, whereby some subjects randomized to no screening invitation receive screening outside the trial.
In many randomized trials, subjects enter the sample sequentially.
Debate persists, despite many randomized trials, perhaps because BM patients are a heterogeneous population.
Similar(42)
While the sample of studies was small, these results indicate that many cluster randomized trials of cancer screening interventions have had deficiencies in the application of correct statistical procedures for the outcome analysis, and that increased adoption of appropriate methods in the early and mid-2000's may not have been sustained.
Note that 0.05 is in the upper ranges of ICC values observed in many cluster randomized trials, and would provide the most conservative (i.e., the largest) sample size estimate.
Many prospective multicenter randomized trials have been conducted; in itself, this may be viewed as progress and evidence of increasing maturity.
Today, many randomized, controlled trials have provided evidence for the efficacy and tolerability of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists in LUTS/BPH, and they are the most frequently used initial treatment option for this cause of LUTS.
Many randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), aiming to show an improvement of survival in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, were performed since the initial PROWESS study and the seminal Early-Goal Directed Therapy study, both published in 2001 [2, 3], in parallel with the release and widespread dissemination of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines [4].
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com