Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Many primary studies include results for other drinking behaviors, but only binge drinking results are examined in this review.
Thus, how many primary studies are too many to synthesise meaningfully is still to be agreed.
Currently, many primary studies do not seem to measure aspects of perceived health and QoL that are important to patients.
How many primary studies are too many to meaningfully synthesise and what are the best methods for synthesising large numbers of studies using a meta-ethnography approach?
This issue is not unique to intervention details; a recent analysis of selective reporting bias of harms outcomes identified that harms data are incompletely reported in many primary studies and also in subsequent systematic reviews.
A major limitation we encountered in our review was that many primary studies included only cursory descriptions of their Internet-based educational intervention (e.g. educational setting, teaching practices and rationale of course design).
Similar(53)
This will overcome limitations related to selective cut-off reporting in many primary study publications.
The problem of how to retain the rich context of the primary studies when conducting a synthesis is therefore complicated by the failure of many primary study authors to provide adequate descriptions of context or of the impact of context on findings.
Systematic reviewers of qualitative studies have found that many primary qualitative studies are poorly reported [ 3].
These findings were most evident in patients with heart failure, where many primary research studies and reviews had been conducted, but also in COPD.
As many primary research studies are included in more than one review the overall results and conclusions of an overview can be biased.
More suggestions(15)
multiple primary studies
many preliminary studies
many fundamental studies
some primary studies
many primary teachers
many primary data
many primary challenges
many primary nanocrystallites
many primary races
many primary schools
many primary spermatocytes
many primary sites
many primary voters
many primary substances
many primary products
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com