Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Many previous binding site analyses only consider binding sites surrounding an experimentally observed bound ligand.
However, many previous binding paradigms cannot exclude the possibility that retrospective binding results from bottom-up interference of sensory outcome processing with action awareness and is functionally unrelated to the processing of the action – outcome association.
Similar(58)
In interpreting many previous SH3 binding experiments, new ligand binding modes may now need to be considered in the experimental interpretation.
Many previous reports have demonstrated HMGA1a binding to the authentic promoters of various genes (for example, human KIT Ligand (hKL) [4], Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A [5], Cox2 [7], [7], interferon-β [8], interleukin-10 [9] and -4 [10], iNos/Nos2 [11], c-Fos and SM22α [12]) using DNase I protection assays and/or electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs).
Many previous studies have shown that HP1 binding and H3K9 methylation are interdependent [40].
In the O1s XPS spectrum, two chemical binding states were resolved: (i) O-metal (530.5 eV) and (ii) OH-M (532 eV) binding states (where M represents In, Ga, and Zn); these binding states agree with those reported in many previous reports[16, 17].
In many previous studies [ 8, 22- 24], relatively large neighborhoods surrounding the ERα binding site (around 500~1000bp) were scanned for consensus sequences of TFBSs.
The structure determined by Banerjee et al. explains many previous findings, including the fact that ions entering the pore from inside the cell can disrupt the binding between the toxin and the ion channel protein.
Many previous publications have proposed that low abundance biomarkers for many diseases may be associated with albumin since binding to albumin extends the half-life of smaller proteins and protein fragments that may otherwise be rapidly cleared by the kidneys [ 11– 15].
The Note carries on many previous Samsung technologies.
The statement contradicted many previous Israeli estimates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com