Ai Feedback
Exact(12)
Third, many complexes are small (composed of two or three distinct proteins), so that traditional topological markers such as density are ineffective.
However, many complexes are only essential in the presence of some drug or stress, so many negative genetic interactions may only be observed under specific conditions.
Second, many complexes are embedded within highly-connected regions of the PPI network, which makes it difficult for clustering algorithms to accurately delimit their boundaries.
First, many complexes are sparsely connected in the PPI network, and cannot be picked out by clustering algorithms which search for dense subgraphs.
Third, many complexes are small (that is, composed of two or three proteins), making measures of important topological features, such as density, ineffectual.
First, many complexes are sparsely connected in the PPI network, and do not form dense clusters that can be derived by clustering algorithms.
Similar(48)
In fact, the fraction of essential genes which are part of many complexes is not significantly higher than the fraction of inessential genes.
Many protein complexes are now known to involve the binding of linear motifs in one of the binding partners.
Many biological complexes are naturally low in abundance and pose a significant challenge to their structural and functional studies.
A truly non-innocent ligand Many nitrosyl complexes are not as straightforward.
Many asexual complexes are composed of hybridising sexual species and their asexual polyploid hybrids.
Related(20)
many developments are
many communities are
many apartments are
many collections are
multiple complexes are
many sites are
many blocks are
many combinations are
many facilities are
various complexes are
many centers are
many compositions are
many towers are
many composites are
many components are
many complexes show
many complexes have
many complexes exhibit
many complexes need
many compounds are
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com