This chapter applies a new theory of singular optimal solutions, and obtains in many cases the optimal flight.
However, examples show that in many cases the optimal designs obtained by the existing criteria cloud not attain the maximum number of clear interested effects for robust parameter experiments.
In many cases, the optimal chelator for an isotope needs to be empirically determined.
And the structures were, in many cases, sub-optimal.
In addition, the masses associated with each observation vector can be adjusted to improve estimation accuracy and in many cases provide the optimal attitude estimate.
In many cases, however, the optimal solutions cannot be implemented because the design is constrained by the application, functionality, and actuation, and by the limitations of processing and packaging technologies.
In many cases an almost optimal choice for the weight (varphi ) in this and related estimates is begin{aligned} varphi =2nG_Omega (cdot,w), end{aligned}where (G_Omega (cdot,w)) is the pluricomplex Green function with pole at (w).
In many cases, the theoretically optimal trees may be clinically unacceptable because they are considered impractical, or unethical.
For practical reasons the options will be dealt with one at a time although, as pointed out in several reviews [ 2, 3], the combination of two or more options, or the combination with limited use of anthelmintics, will in many cases be the optimal approach.
"So in many cases satellite is the optimal solution, although it may not be the fastest one".
