Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(40)
This manuscript was reviewed by PROMIS reviewers before submission for external peer review.
Each manuscript was reviewed by at least two reviewers (most by three reviewers) and went through two rounds of reviews.
This manuscript was reviewed by an anonymous reviewer and Dr Yuriy Gusev.
Each manuscript was reviewed by at least three reviewers and was substantially revised according to reviewers' critiques before acceptance into the supplement.
Each manuscript was reviewed by at least two reviewers in addition to the review by the editorial board.
24 May 2015: An earlier version of this manuscript was reviewed and though that earlier version was rejected, the reviewers and editors recognized the importance and interest of the problem under study and encouraged us to try and improve the manuscript and, provided we were able address the important limitations of the earlier version, submit an improved manuscript for review.
Similar(20)
In Section 2 some preliminaries and definitions in the fractional calculus that used in this manuscript are reviewed.
The study protocol and draft manuscript were reviewed and approved by the Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation YKHCC).
After this, full text of selected manuscripts was reviewed.
Following the selection process, the full text of 264 manuscripts was reviewed, of which a total of 120 original papers were finally considered (Fig. 1).
When manuscripts are reviewed, we as reviewers and editors have to start to ask to see the data, if only to guarantee their quality.
More suggestions(15)
manuscript was evaluated
paper was reviewed
manuscript was examined
manuscript was peer reviewed
manuscript was put
manuscript was discovered
manuscript was rejected
manuscript was prepared
manuscript was projected
manuscript was shot
manuscript was mailed
manuscript was written
manuscript was cut
manuscript was bought
manuscript was done
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com