Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The manuscript does not provide answer to some important questions: Is the length of the sequence limited?
In contrast to that paper, the present manuscript does not provide an in depth study of trial-by-trial learning.
The manuscript does not provide sufficient discussion of relevant prior work and quantitative comparison with other published approaches for which code is available (e.g., Bickerton et al. 2012).
4) A major strength of DTI is that it provides important information about anatomy, but the current manuscript does not provide an adequate treatment of the anatomy.
Unfortunately the manuscript does not provide a deep and insightful analysis of the data and the evidence supporting their claims is not very compelling or convincing.
While the difficulty of providing this is acknowledged, it remains the case that the revised manuscript does not provide any additional data addressing such mechanistic possibilities, reducing cross-disciplinary impact of the manuscript.
Similar(54)
However, as far as I can tell, this manuscript does not provided any data or cite any papers that quantify the effect of peak calling on motif discovery.
But the manuscript doesn't provide direct evidence for a conformational change, and I don't think the data provides a paradigm for the broader field of researchers studying multiprotein complexes.
We agree with the reviewers that our original manuscript did not provide assessment of our causality testing methodology.
The manuscript, however, does not provide some important experimental details and information on controls.
However, it could not be used to develop the warning system and to carry out the elaborations accounted for in this manuscript, because it does not provide the exact timing of triggering of each landslide, which is a mandatory information to develop, calibrate and validate rainfall thresholds and warning systems (Guzzetti et al. 2007; Rosi et al. 2015).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com