Suggestions(5)
Exact(5)
The result was shown in Figure 4C of the revised manuscript and explained.
We have responded to both reviewers comments in the new manuscript and explained the context in more detail.
This result was represented as Figure 5D in the revised manuscript, and explained in paragraph three, subheading "Effect of IREF-2 on viral RNA synthesis in infected cells" in the revised manuscript.
The result was represented as Figure 5D in the revised manuscript, and explained and discussed in the Results section (paragraph three, subheading "Effect of IREF-2 on viral RNA synthesis in infected cells").
This result was newly added as Figure 5D in the revised manuscript, and explained in paragraph three, subheading "Effect of IREF-2 on viral RNA synthesis in infected cells".
Similar(55)
We have now revised the manuscript as suggested and explained in detail in the Results section where we first mentioned the bone marrow chimera experiments.
In general this is a nice manuscript and clearly explained.
This is now stated and explained in the manuscript.
The result is newly represented as Figure 3D and explained in the revised manuscript (paragraph three, subheading "Identification of pp32 and APRIL as IREF-2").
This result is represented as Figure 4 figure supplement 2, and explained in the revised manuscript (paragraph two, "Interaction between IREF-2 and viral RNA polymerases").Reviewer #3: 1) The source of polymerase the authors used is micrococcal nuclease treated vRNPs purified from virions.
Thomas Lannon, the library's assistant curator for manuscripts and archives, explained that at the time these substances were not regulated by the government, and that Leary and his group did not consider them drugs but aids to reaching self-awareness.
More suggestions(15)
hand and explained
manuscript and started
manuscript and contributed
manuscript and checked
manuscript and pressed
manuscript and did
manuscript and corrected
manuscript and proceeded
manuscript and drafted
manuscript and performed
manuscript and supervised
manuscript and inhaled
manuscript and brought
manuscript and revised
manuscript and searched
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com