Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
We thank P. Gönczy, B. Bowerman, E. Paluch, C. Hoege, M. Mayer, G. Greenan and J. Bois for critical comments on the manuscript and discussions about the project, A. Pozniakovsky for clones and S. Ernst for assistance with bombardments.
The authors thank Yves Rivière, Florence Buseyne and Ren Zhu for their critical reading of the manuscript and discussions, the patients for their willingness to participate in this study and Estelle Mottez for her support in organizing the trial.
We acknowledge Zhang Bing and Nagiza Samatova for general advice on the G-test and Paul Dominic B. Olinares and Wojciech Majeran for comments on the manuscript and discussions.
We thank P. F. Cliften for computational assistance and discussions related to the project, and X. Xiao for helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript and discussions of these ideas.
Contributed to manuscript and discussions: HKMV HGR VNK OCL ALBD.
We would like to thank the members of the ECORN-CF study group for their fruitful work on the issues of this manuscript and discussions at the quality round tables.
Similar(54)
We thank Drs. Yu Liu, Jiankang Jin, Yulong He, and Mr. J. Philippe York for critical reading of the manuscript and discussion.
JA helped in drafting the manuscript and discussion of results.
JM-P and J-PP contributed to writing the manuscript and discussion of the results.
We thank Dr. Thomas Chen at the University of Connecticut for reviewing this manuscript and discussion.
BFG: selection of patients, writing of the manuscript and discussion of results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com