Suggestions(3)
Exact(1)
We add on the manuscript a discussion about this possibility.
Similar(59)
Firstly, the manuscript presents a discussion about many factors that affect wine production, and secondly, the focus is more on the development of an integrated approach using numerical and symbolic reasoning.
The manuscript includes a discussion of our considerations of this problem (Discussion, paragraphs five to eight).
The manuscript has been improved but there are some remaining issues that need to be addressed before acceptance, as outlined below: 1) Regarding Essential Revision point #5, this caveat should also be included in the manuscript as a discussion point.
[Editors' note: further revisions were requested prior to acceptance, as described below.] 1) Regarding Essential Revision point #5, this caveat should also be included in the manuscript as a discussion point.
Starting with an overview on types of solid plastic waste (SPW) and their origins, the manuscript continues with a discussion on the different valorisation options for SPW.
This manuscript may encourage a discussion about this important issue.
The revised manuscript now includes a discussion of this important issue.
Therefore, we have revised the manuscript to include a discussion of the issue of the reference electrode in this experiment and identified issues which need to be addressed in future experiments.
In the revised manuscript, we have included a discussion on the positive feedback loop between mir-17-92 mir-17-92 mir-17-92
In our revised manuscript, we have expanded a discussion of our fitting strategy in the Materials and methods.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com